June 11, 2008 - 10:17am

Medical board to discuss conflict of interest policy

The Review-Journal is running a story that details the conflict of interest policy that our state's Board of Medical Examiners will discuss this week.

"This was a subject addressed to us during (legislative committee) meetings. The nursing board has one. Our board does not,'' said Tony Clark, executive director. "I plan to ask the board if it wants to adopt such a policy.''

There is no doubt the board will adopt the policy. When the media spotlight from something of the magnitude of the hepatitis scare shines on a group like this or any board, the light usually finds something crucial that is missing.

Crafting policy under a media spotlight is far from ideal. Having no conflict of interest policy is a clear problem, but the governmental tendency to over-correct is a problem of equal magnitude. The board must function free of conflicts of interest, but it must be able to function. This policy should not be so restrictive that it precludes any successful doctor from serving.

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <b> <i> <p> <br> <span> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.