July 1, 2008 - 10:26am
News

Bill to keep tax rebates from casinos killed

Lobbyists swiftly thwarted an effort by state senators to cancel tax rebates given to the gaming industry on Friday, according to reports by the Las Vegas Sun and the Reno Gazette-Journal.

At issue was a Nevada Supreme Court decision that stated Casinos did not have to pay tax on free meals for their employees or comped meals for guests, which led to casinos filing requests for refunds that could reach over $100 million. The legislation introduced yesterday would have clarified the definition of a meal for tax purposes, preventing them from collecting a rebate.

When word got out about the bill, and its "unanimous" support, they descended on the offices capital, according to the Sun. Despite the visible presence of lobbyists, many lawmakers did not acknowledge any impact they might have had on the Republican majority's decision not to consider the bill and Governor Gibbon's public statement retracting his support for it.

Bill Bible, head of the Nevada Resort Association, denied doing any lobbying himself and said that the bill's death owed more to partisan bickering than industry action, according to the Sun.

"Quite frankly, I thought the bill would be approved and passed out," he told the Sun. "It appears to me it was bogged down in partisan wrangling at the tail end of the day."

However, one lawmaker - state Sen. Randolph Townsend (R-Reno) -- told the Gazette-Journal some of what was happening behind the scenes:

Townsend said he didn't want the Legislature to meddle in pending litigation. He acknowledged talking to gaming lobbyists throughout the day who were worried about the bill's potential cost.

"This was a major hit on them without dialogue or discussion," Townsend said. "It just came flying out of the other house without a hearing."

MICHAEL GSOVSKI can be reached via email at michael.gsovski@gmail.com.

Comments

Free, comped meals/drinks


The State Supreme Court struck down the debt owed by Nevada casinos, some say without really looking closely at the law that required payment in the first place. The Senate Republicans knew that the Supreme Court had agreed to revisit their ruling and that the probabilities are high that they will reverse themselves when they read the actual law and read the actual words in it. In case you haven't noticed, our Supreme Court frequently plays tennis with itself.

07/05/08 5:37 pm

Man what I great informative


Man what I great informative article. This Michael Gsovski guy needs more articles, I am quickly becoming a frequent reader. I think they should def have to pay taxes though on those meals, its not cool.

07/10/08 1:14 pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <b> <i> <p> <br> <span> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.